|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
DFA sells a very useful
mix of targeted index funds. Unfortunately, it's a hassle to buy them.
Can you get past the bouncer?

By Thomas Easton

|
| |
|
JUST LIKE ANY OTHER consumer
products company, fund sponsors slug it out for attention: Meet Mr. Top
Return. Hear Ms. Emerging Markets. If you had only put $10,000 with us back
when, you'd have enough to send your child to college. Send us a check. Now.
The carnival atmosphere is missing from a handful of fund families. The
frugal Vanguard Group, for example, scarcely advertises at all; it counts on
investors who like low-cost funds to beat a path to its door.
Dimensional Fund Advisors, a Santa Monica, Calif.-based sponsor with $9
billion in fund assets, takes this aloofness a step further. Beat a path to
DFA's door, and you may find it slammed in your face.
Who would want to get in? The same sort of people who like Vanguard. DFA
runs passive index funds and near-index funds. Their fees are fairly low,
their frictional costs from trading are low, and they don't pay out much in
taxable capital gains. A passively managed fund is almost never going to top
the charts in any given year, but it can easily beat out most actively
managed funds over long holding periods—10 or 20 years, that is.
Like Vanguard, DFA has a very low cost fund to track the S&P 500 index.
It has 19 other passive funds, some specializing in foreign stocks, some in
small stocks, some in bonds. A few of the funds are modified index funds:
They follow investing themes, such as value stocks or small-company stocks.
But the stock selection is always mechanical.
|
| |
|
The themes come from academia—for example, the theory
that stocks selling at low multiples of earnings and book value beat growth
stocks over time. The eminent finance professors Merton Miller, Myron
Scholes and Eugene Fama sit on the boards of the DFA funds. The other
part of the DFA formula is transactional dexterity. The 22 people managing
DFA's portfolios are all traders. By making markets in many of the thousands
of stocks that populate the funds, DFA claims, it enjoys negative
transaction costs. Suppose a small over-the-counter stock is quoted at 20
bid, 20 3/4 asked. Even if DFA wants the stock, it may hold off buying until
some trader puts in a big sell order, say, for 200,000 shares (to be spread
among funds and institutional accounts). DFA may offer to take the block for
18 or 19. When the DFA traders sell a thinly traded stock, in contrast, they
dribble the shares out a few hundred at a time.
It works well enough. Look at DFA's U.S. 6-10 Small Company Fund, which
mechanically buys stocks that are ranked in the bottom 50% in market value
on the New York Stock Exchange. This fund has outperformed Vanguard's
comparable Small Capitalization index fund by a fraction of a percent over
the three years of its existence.
Intrigued? Be prepared for a battle to get in. Originally an
institutional manager with a $2 million minimum, DFA in 1989 lowered its
account minimum to $25,000. But it accepts only money referred by financial
advisers. And not just any adviser will do.
|
No carnival barkers at DFA. The only ones jumping through hoops are
customers.

|
|
Consider the experience of Abner Oldham, a
Chattanooga, Tenn. investment adviser. Other fund sponsors write, call and
even visit him, begging for business. He found DFA himself while doing a
computerized screen. In response to calls, DFA sent a binder the size of a
telephone book describing what it does. He had to read it, report back, then
drive 300 miles for a two-hour meeting in a hotel lobby, then go to a more
distant city for a conference on how to use DFA's funds. "My wife said
she couldn't believe I was flying anywhere to get a mutual fund," says
Oldham. "Everyone else is willing to come to us."
Why does DFA play hard to get? One reason: to screen out hot money. A
flood of new purchases, followed a few months later by a rush of
redemptions, would wreak havoc on DFA's efforts to keep trading to a
minimum. The funds would be chasing after stocks one day and unloading them
at distress prices the next, says Rex Sinquefield, a founder and cochairman
of DFA.
There's also a paternalistic motivation. Sinquefield wants his investors
to balance holdings among several different passive funds. By lecturing the
advisers he can get that result.
Consider the volatile DFA Japanese Small Company Fund: It took off in the
1980s, and then skidded in the 1990s. "It's probably been the worst
investment in the galaxy recently," says Sinquefield. "Suppose an individual
wanted to put all their money into that? We wouldn't want to be
responsible."
If you want in, find a financial planner to make an introduction. Oldham
charges 0.25% to place anything over $500,000. That's a bargain if you
really need advice, but what if you have selected the funds and all you want
is for the planner to stick a check in an envelope? If you hunt long enough,
you might find an adviser who will charge by the hour. Call 888-333-6659 to
get a directory of planners from the National Association of Personal
Financial Advisers in Buffalo Grove, Ill.
|
|
Dicing the world into cheap slices
Low turnover, low fees, low profile.
| Fund |
3-year annua-
lized total
return |
Assets ($mil) |
Weighted average |
Median market cap ($mil) |
Annual exp. per share |
Portfolio turnover |
| P/E |
price/ book |
| Fixed Income |
| Five-Year Government |
3.8% |
$164 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
$0.28 |
398% |
| Global Fixed-Income |
7.1 |
152 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.46 |
130 |
| Intermediate Government Fixed-Income |
4.6 |
97 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.27 |
41 |
| One-Year Fixed-Income |
5.2 |
909 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.20 |
81 |
| Two-Year Global Fixed-Income |
NA |
297 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.32 |
NA |
| Stock |
| Continental Small Company |
8.5 |
315 |
22.1 |
2.1 |
$325 |
0.74 |
10 |
| DFA Real Estate Securities |
5.5 |
56 |
22.9 |
2.0 |
690 |
0.82 |
1 |
| Emerging Markets |
NA |
143 |
18.2 |
3.4 |
1,822 |
1.58 |
8 |
| International High Book to Market |
8.5 |
228 |
27.1 |
1.9 |
8,974 |
0.68 |
10 |
| International Small Cap Value |
NA |
352 |
31.2 |
0.9 |
NA |
0.91 |
10 |
| International Value |
NA |
287 |
28.3 |
1.8 |
7,051 |
0.65 |
10 |
| Japanese Small Company |
-2.0 |
345 |
44.8 |
2.5 |
493 |
0.74 |
8 |
| Large Cap International |
5.1 |
76 |
29.4 |
3.6 |
20,925 |
0.57 |
24 |
| Pacific Rim Small Company |
4.9 |
199 |
23.2 |
2.4 |
309 |
0.83 |
6 |
| United Kingdom Small Company |
13.1 |
166 |
18.6 |
3.4 |
204 |
0.72 |
8 |
| US 6-10 Small Company |
12.9 |
290 |
23.0 |
3.0 |
299 |
0.49 |
21 |
| US 9-10 Small Company |
15.9 |
1,181 |
22.4 |
3.2 |
113 |
0.62 |
25 |
| US Large Cap Value |
14.9 |
443 |
15.1 |
1.8 |
7,857 |
0.42 |
29 |
| US Large Company |
17.5 |
158 |
22.2 |
4.6 |
23,659 |
0.24 |
2 |
| US Small Cap Value |
14.4 |
1,150 |
20.3 |
1.8 |
274 |
0.64 |
21 |
* Through Oct. 31. NA: Not available or not applicable.
Source: Morningstar, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|